Recruitment · Agentic Operations Layer

The AI operations layer
for your hiring pipeline.

Put a team of agents on yoursourcing.

Rach.Dev runs sourcing, candidate screening, interview scheduling, offers and onboarding across the systems you already use — with job-relevant, EEOC-aware guardrails, a recruiter in the loop on every hiring decision, and a full audit trail on every action.

EEOC & ban-the-box awareWorks with your existing ATSRecruiter-in-the-loopEnglish & Spanish
The operating picture

What an agent team takes off your desk

Most of recruiting isn't judgement — it's chasing résumés, herding calendars and re-keying notes into the ATS. Here's where agents own the busywork, mapped to how your hiring pipeline actually runs.

In demo

The Front Door

Every applicant captured, parsed and routed — 24/7, in English or Spanish.

  • Multi-channel intake (apply page, job boards, SMS, referrals)
  • Résumé parse & ATS record creation
  • Acknowledgement and next-step reply in seconds
In demo

Screen & Fairness

Job-relevant scoring with explicit EEOC and ban-the-box guardrails.

  • Scores against the configured, job-relevant rubric only
  • Never asks protected-class or prohibited questions
  • Flags every borderline call for recruiter review
In demo

Sourcing & Outreach

Drafts JD-matched outreach and re-engages your talent pool — you approve the send.

  • LinkedIn + talent-pool matches to the open req
  • Personalized outreach drafts from approved templates
  • Replies parsed; interested candidates staged for review
In demo

Interview Logistics

The multi-party calendar nightmare, solved end to end.

  • Finds slots across candidate and full panel
  • Sends confirmations, prep packs and reminders
  • Handles reschedules without a human in the chain
In demo

Offer & Onboarding

Offers drafted, never sent without sign-off; new hires guided through day one to ninety.

  • Offer letter drafted from the approved band & policy
  • Background-check and reference workflows kicked off
  • Onboarding buddy answers benefits, IT and policy Qs
In demo

Req & Placement Health

The metrics a TA lead lives by: time-to-fill, source quality, placement status.

  • Time-to-fill and stage-conversion tracking per req
  • Source-of-hire and cost-per-hire roll-ups
  • Placement / start confirmation and fee tracking
In your build

Compliance & Records

The OFCCP/EEO paperwork and retention no one wants to own.

  • EEO/OFCCP applicant-flow logging
  • Configurable candidate-data retention & deletion
  • Audit-ready record of every screen decision
In demo

Knowledge Layer

A role-aware assistant grounded only in your approved sources.

  • Separate views for candidate, recruiter, hiring manager
  • Every answer cites its source
  • Hard guardrails — never legal or eligibility advice

Watch the team run a req

Pick a candidate and press play. Watch the agent team run the pipeline end to end — a recruiter or hiring manager approves every hiring decision.

Control Tower
Jordan Avery · Senior Backend EngineerApplied via careers page — req #ENG-204
Apply page · Greenhouse
Apply
Screen
Sourcing
Schedule
Decision
Offer
Onboard
Agents
AvaCandidate Intake
Idle
MarcusScreening & Fairness
Idle
NoraSourcing & Briefs
Idle
OwenInterview Coordination
Idle
RileyOffers & Pipeline Metrics
Idle
IrisKnowledge Assistant
Idle
HopePipeline Sentinel
Idle
Decision trace0/7

Press Run the journey — or scroll in and watch it play automatically. Every clinical action waits for a clinician.

Every hiring decision waits for a person. Rach.Dev drafts, scores and stages — a recruiter or hiring manager approves.

Seven specialists, one conductor

Each agent owns one job and hands the next a complete, structured context. Atlas routes the work, enforces the human-in-the-loop gates and the EEOC guardrails, and writes every action to an audit log.

Atlas

Atlas is the orchestrator. It routes each candidate to the right specialist, carries shared req context between them, pauses for recruiter or hiring-manager approval on every hiring decision, enforces job-relevant screening, and records a complete, timestamped audit trail.

Live handoff pipeline
AvaIntake
MarcusScreen
NoraSource
OwenCoord
RileyOffers
IrisKnowledge
HopePipeline

Click Ava below — the full apply-to-onboarding workflow plays out automatically.

MarcusScreening & Fairness

Screening & fairness. Scores candidates against the configured, job-relevant rubric, enforces EEOC and ban-the-box guardrails, and escalates anything non-compliant — never running a disallowed filter.

Context from Ava
Jordan AverySenior Backend EngineerUS work authorized
Scored on the approved rubric — skills, depth, role fit
Guardrail check: no protected-class or ban-the-box questions
Disallowed criterion (e.g. age proxy) → blocked and escalated

Marcus screens on job-relevant criteria only. Non-compliant requests are refused, never silently applied.

Job-relevant scoringEEOC guardrailsEscalation
NoraSourcing & Briefs

Sourcing & briefs. Matches the talent pool and LinkedIn to the open req, drafts personalized outreach from approved templates, and assembles a complete, cited recruiter brief — you approve every send.

Context from Marcus
Strong skills matchSalary expectation: in bandCleared screen
Talent-pool and LinkedIn matches surfaced for the req
Outreach draft built from an approved template
Cited recruiter brief assembled — sent only after approval

Draft only. Outreach goes out solely after a recruiter approves it.

Talent-pool matchingOutreach draftsRecruiter briefs
OwenInterview Coordination

Interview coordination. Finds slots across the candidate and the full panel, sends confirmations, prep packs and reminders, and handles reschedules without a human ever joining the calendar chain.

Context from Nora
4-person panelOnsite loopCandidate availability
Slot found across candidate and full interview panel
Confirmations, prep pack and reminders sent
Reschedule handled end to end; ATS calendar synced
Multi-party schedulingConfirmations & prepReschedules
RileyOffers & Pipeline Metrics

Offers & pipeline metrics. Drafts the offer letter at the approved band, kicks off background and reference checks after sign-off, and tracks time-to-fill, source-of-hire and placement status per req.

Context from Owen
Panel: advanceBand: L5 approvedStart: ~3 weeks
Offer letter drafted at the approved comp band
Background + reference checks staged for after sign-off
Offer awaits hiring-manager e-signature before any send

Riley drafts and tracks. No offer is sent until a hiring manager signs.

Offer draftingTime-to-fill & sourcePlacement tracking
IrisKnowledge Assistant

The role-aware knowledge assistant. Answers candidates, recruiters and hiring managers from your approved sources only — every answer cited, and never legal, immigration or eligibility advice.

Context from Riley
Candidate viewApproved sources onlyEN / ES
Answered candidate questions from the job posting & policy
Every answer carried its source citation
Legal / work-eligibility question → handed to a human, not answered

Iris informs. It never gives legal, immigration or eligibility advice, or makes a hiring call.

Role-awareCited answersNever legal advice
HopePipeline Sentinel

The Pipeline Sentinel. Always on, reading the live state of every open req — flagging aging reqs, candidates going cold and offer-decline risk before a top candidate slips away, and staging the nudge for the recruiter.

Context from the recruiting team
Open reqs: 38Hot candidatesOffers outstanding
How Hope calibrates for this team
Baselines normal stage velocity per req and per recruiter
Tightens thresholds for hard-to-fill and high-priority reqs
Suppresses noise so only real risk reaches a recruiter
What Hope watches in real time
Req ageStage stallCandidate silenceCompeting offersOffer agingSource dry-up
Aging req — open past your time-to-fill target with no movement
Candidate going cold — no contact since the last interview
Offer-decline risk — verbal accepted elsewhere or offer aging out
Panel bottleneck — interviews stalled waiting on one interviewer
Pipeline thinning — top-of-funnel drying up for a critical req
Fairness drift — adverse-impact signal in a stage's pass rates

Hope is advisory. It alerts and stages a nudge — a recruiter decides and acts. Every alert is logged with the signal that triggered it.

Live · PipelineAlways-on monitorAging & decline riskAdvisory only

Ava captures patient intake by voice, then hands a structured summary to 6 downstream agents — triage, documentation, coordination, billing, knowledge and ICU monitoring — each acting on the shared context, with Atlas orchestrating and a clinician approving every clinical action.

Ava starts the workflow.

One layer over the systems you already run

Rach.Dev sits on top of your ATS and existing tools — orchestrating agents, enforcing governance and EEOC guardrails, and keeping a recruiter in the loop. No rip-and-replace.

Layer 4Human-in-the-loop

Every hiring decision — advance, reject, offer — pauses for a recruiter or hiring manager to approve. Agents draft, score and stage; people decide.

Approval gatesRecruiter sign-offRole-based access
Layer 3Governance & audit

EEOC and ban-the-box guardrails, job-relevant criteria only, configurable candidate-data retention, and a complete, timestamped audit trail on every action and decision.

EEOC-awareFull audit logData retentionSource citations
Layer 2Agent orchestration

Atlas routes each candidate to the right specialist, carries shared req context between agents, and coordinates hand-offs end to end.

Routing & hand-offShared contextEscalation paths
Layer 1Integration

Bidirectional connectors to your ATS, calendars, sourcing channels and HRIS over the standards your systems already speak.

ATS APIsCalendar & emailWebhooks & APIs
Works with the systems you already run
GreenhouseLeverWorkdayLinkedIn RecruiterIndeedGoogle CalendarMicrosoft 365TwilioCheckrBamboo HR

A knowledge layer that knows its limits

Iris answers candidates, recruiters and hiring managers from your approved sources only. Every answer is cited — and a legal, immigration or eligibility question is always handed to a human, never advised.

Try a question

IrisCandidate view

Hi, I'm Iris. Ask me about this role, the interview process or next steps — I'll always cite my source.

Iris provides information only — never legal, immigration or work-eligibility advice, and never a hiring decision. Anything regulated is routed to a qualified human.

A knowledge layer that knows its limits — questions and answers

What are the next steps after my interview?
Your onsite loop with the engineering panel is scheduled for Thursday, June 11 at 1:00 PM. After the loop, the panel submits scorecards and your recruiter, Megan Calhoun, follows up within two business days. You can reschedule anytime by replying here.
¿Cuánto paga este puesto y qué turno es?
Según la publicación del empleo, este puesto de almacén paga entre $19 y $22 por hora, en el turno de mañana (7:00 AM a 3:30 PM), de lunes a viernes. Los beneficios comienzan a los 30 días. Si necesita más detalles, puedo conectarla con un reclutador.
Can you tell me if my visa makes me eligible to work here?
That's a legal work-authorization question, so I won't advise on it myself. I've routed your question to our recruiting and HR team, who can walk you through the eligibility and documentation steps. You may also wish to consult a qualified immigration attorney.

Governance, not just guardrails

The controls that let a talent team actually deploy agents — enforced in the system, not promised on a slide.

Recruiter in the loopEvery hiring decision — advance, reject, offer — waits for a recruiter or hiring manager to approve. No agent advances, rejects or offers on its own.
Complete audit trailEvery action, hand-off, screen decision and data access is logged with a timestamp, the agent, the source and the approver — exportable on demand for OFCCP/EEO review.
EEOC & data-retention alignedScreening runs on job-relevant criteria only, with ban-the-box rules configurable per jurisdiction, and candidate data kept to a configurable retention window then deleted.
Grounded with sourcesAnswers come only from your approved sources — job postings, policies, the ATS — and cite them. No open-web guessing, no ungrounded claims about a role.
No vendor lock-inStandards-based connectors to your ATS and tools, and your candidate data stays yours. Turn an agent off and your systems keep running.

Live audit log

A sample of what every action looks like on the record.

21:51:09Inbound SMS (es) received & answered — candidate #7714Logged
08:32:40Résumé parsed & ATS record created — req #ENG-204Created
08:33:12Screen scored on job-relevant rubric — no protected-class data usedEEO
08:34:05Offer letter drafted (L5 band) — awaiting sign-offPending
08:35:47Offer approved by David Okonkwo, Hiring ManagerApproved
10:14:22Disallowed filter (age proxy) blocked — fairness review escalatedEscalated

What changes when agents own the busywork

Directional outcomes our pilots target — validated on your own data, never assumed.

24/7
Coverage, every channel
Apply page, job boards and SMS answered around the clock, in English and Spanish — no candidate waiting on a reply.
Minutes
From apply to recruiter brief
Résumé parsed, job-relevant screen scored and a cited brief assembled before a recruiter opens the record.
Faster
Time-to-fill
Scheduling, nudges and aging-req alerts compress the dead time between stages — fewer top candidates lost to a competing offer.
Hours back
For recruiters
Less screening, scheduling and re-keying, more time on relationships, calibration and the judgment calls that need a human.

The problem, in numbers

  • Across US employers, time-to-fill has historically averaged roughly six weeks (about 42 days), which is enough delay for top candidates to take a competing offer. SHRM Talent Acquisition Benchmarking Report
  • SHRM benchmarking data puts the average cost per hire at roughly $4,700, with total cost to hire often estimated at three to four times the role's salary. SHRM, The Real Costs of Recruitment
  • Candidate-experience research finds that roughly 6 in 10 candidates lose interest in a role after about two weeks with no post-interview update — slow, silent pipelines cost you the hire. RecruitBPM, Candidate Experience Statistics

Figures above are external benchmarks and pilot targets, not guarantees — we validate every number on your own data before you rely on it. Monitoring agents are advisory: they alert and stage, a recruiter acts.

Start with one req type. Prove it. Then scale.

We stand up a single workflow on your existing ATS, show the audit trail and the outcomes, and expand only once your team trusts it.

01
Scope one workflow

Pick the highest-pain workflow — high-volume screening, scheduling or pipeline watch — and we map it to your ATS.

02
Pilot in your environment

Agents run on your ATS with a recruiter in the loop, EEOC guardrails on, and a full audit trail, in weeks not quarters.

03
Measure, then expand

Review the outcomes on your own data — time-to-fill, source quality, candidate experience — then roll the agent team out req type by req type.